Science communication

Three curious climate change clues

We’ve read a lot about ice cores, sediments, isotopes – but evidence for climate change can come from some unlikely places. After yesterday’s ‘four strange effects of climate change’, as part of our Climate Week series we present three very curious climate clues…

Fossil raindrops

fossil raindrops 2It turns out, you really can fossilise just about everything. After squid ink, soft tissues and coprolites we thought we’d seen it all. But according to some scientists, the imprints of raindrops from millions of years ago have been preserved in sediments, and can be used to tell us something about past climates.

‘Palaeobarometry’ has been used to estimate what the atmosphere was like at the time the raindrops were preserved. A specimen from 2.7 billion years ago, for example, told NASA’s Sanjoy Som that Earth’s atmosphere then probably contained a lot of nitrogen, but no oxygen. [1]

Fossil raindrop impressions on the top of a wave-rippled sandstone from the Horton Bluff Formation (Mississippian), near Avonport, Nova Scotia

Fossil raindrop impressions on the top of a wave-rippled sandstone from the Horton Bluff Formation (Mississippian), near Avonport, Nova Scotia

He did this by looking at the diameter of the imprints, which gave him information about how fast the raindrops were falling when they hit the ground. This speed depends on the density of the air, which the study estimated can’t have been more than twice that of today. That tells us something about the composition of the atmosphere, suggesting it can’t have contained nearly as large a percentage of greenhouse gases as previously thought.

The raindrops in question fell on volcanic ash and quickly buried by more ash, preserving them in fine detail. There are many candidates for fossil raindrop samples, but some scientists are skeptical – are they really raindrops, or can they be explained by other phenomena, such as bubbles rising through mud?

Turner paintings

Turner's 'Chichester Canal', c. 1828 - the yellow tinge is perhaps due to high levels of tephra in the atmosphere following Tambora's eruption

Turner’s ‘Chichester Canal’, c. 1828 – the yellow tinge is perhaps due to high levels of tephra in the atmosphere following Tambora’s eruption

Fascinated by science, British Romantic painter J M W Turner was friends with Mary Sommerville and Michael Faraday. So he’d probably be delighted to know climate scientists have used his paintings to study the effect on climate of huge volcanic eruptions.

Scientists at the National Observatory of Athens have studied various paintings by old masters, and Turner’s striking sunsets provide evidence of what happened following the eruption of Mount Tambora in Indonesia, 1815, which brought on the famous ‘Year without a Summer.’ Turner also witnessed, and painted the effects of, Babuyan, Philippines in 1831, and Cosiguina, Nicaragua, in 1835.

The team analysed Turner’s sunsets for the relative amounts of red and green, finding that the ratio changed sharply after each eruption for up to three years. They have used the ratios to estimate the amount of airbourne dust the volcanoes produced, hoping the results can help improve computer models used to simulate global warming. [2]

Turner's 'Festival of the Opening of the Vintage at Macon'

Turner’s ‘Festival of the Opening of the Vintage at Macon’, 1803

It’s fitting that scientists have turned to Turner – apparantly he was also inspired by them. According to his biographer, James Hamilton, when Turner was visiting Burlington House’s Royal Academy of Arts, he had a habit of listening in on scientific meetings happening in adjacent rooms – where the Royal Society was then based.

Hamilton believes Turner eavesdropped on William Herschel discussing his theories about the sun. Herschel described ‘ridges, nodules and corrugations’ on its surface, which Hamilton suggested Turner used to inspire some of the effects in his paintings, such as in ‘Festival of the Opening of the Vintage at Macon.’ [3]

Dwarf Elephants

1. Cretan Dwarf Elephant/Mammoth, second lower molar, crown (1.) and side (1a.) views (specimen NHM M.9378), ¾ natural size 2. Cretan Dwarf Elephant/Mammoth, crown view of second upper molar, one molar plate restored (holotype specimen NHM M.9377), ¾ natural size 3. Cretan Straight-tusked Elephant, crown view of first and second lower right molars (specimen NHM M.9384), ⅔ natural size

Dwarf elephant teeth (1 and 2)

That’s right. Dwarf elephants. Hard to imagine now, these too-adorable sounding creatures are sadly extinct, but once lived on islands in the Mediterranean, Indonesia and as far as off the coasts of Siberia and California.

At the Natural History Museum, Victoria Herridge is studying dwarfism and what it can tell us about climate change – as island species, dwarf elephants were extremely vulnerable to rapid climate change, and lived through a time (800,000 – 3,000 years ago) where climate fluctuated between extreme ice ages and warm periods every 100,000 years.

A skeleton of the Cretan Dwarf Elephant (Mammuthus creticus).

A skeleton of the Cretan Dwarf Elephant (Mammuthus creticus).

With sea levels changing as climate fluctuated, the sizes of the islands, their distance to the mainland, and whether they were joined by land bridges would have changed, so the evolution and distribution of dwarf elephants can tell us a lot about past climates.

It’s even possible that such studies can tell us something about how mammals might respond to climate change today.

Dr Herridge visited the Society last year to tell us more about her project – you can watch the video of her talk below.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s